There’s a very funny scene in the old film “The Life of Brian” in which there are a
large number of women dressed up as men joining in with the crowd in jeering a
man who is being stoned to death. The
women had to do this because women were not supposed to be at stonings, and the
humour of the story arose when some of the religious authorities began to
suspect that there were some women there, but they couldn’t exactly tell.
It has been suggested by one of the
commentators I read, that our Gospel story today is a case just like that. Mary in this story was in a place she should
not have been. Our Sudanese will
understand this better because they have lived by rules that mean that the men
and the women eat separately. But in
this story, Mary crosses the line.
I think John has rather carefully crafted the
telling of these stories because there are some nice echoes of the stories of
Lazarus and Mary in the chapters that follow.
The death and resurrection of Lazarus pre-figures Jesus own death and
resurrection, and Mary's gesture of anointing the feet of Jesus rather than his
head as you might expect in such a story, prefigures the teaching of Jesus that
will follow when he commands his disciples to follow his example and wash one
another’s feet.
The story we are considering happened just
after Jesus had raised Lazarus to life and it seems to be the case that it was
a direct expression of gratitude to Jesus by the new man Lazarus. And Mary invades the male space at this
meal. It was not inappropriate for
Martha to serve the meal to the men as it seems she did, but Mary’s behaviour
was inappropriate – indeed it could have been regarded as scandalous.
John in his telling of the story seems to
want to emphasise the extravagance of Mary’s gesture. The nard she uses was an aromatic essential
oil from the Far East so it would have been very expensive and have travelled a
long way in the baggage of merchants.
Social mores of the time would have judged Mary’s actions as scandalous
– her anointing and gentle wiping of Jesus feet was something that belonged in
the bedroom, not a public place like this.
But it is the extravagance of the gesture
that incites Judas to words. He rebukes
this woman for invading male space in order to do this to Jesus.
To Judas’ shame, Jesus affirms both the right
of Mary to be and what she has chosen to do.
In his eyes Mary is exactly where she should be. He has made it clear from the beginning of his
public ministry that women, children and other powerless people of that day were
welcome in his company. The coming reign
of God would be a time and place where all were welcome, all are valued.
This woman who goes where she is not supposed
to go is important for another reason. Her
brother Lazarus was dead and now he is alive.
This dinner is to celebrate that barrier-shattering event. He was dead and the stench that was referred
to as coming from his tomb when Jesus arrived – the odour of death – stands in
stark contrast to the odour of this costly perfume – a sweet smell of life.
It is reasonable to think that some of the people
close to Jesus were aware of how close he was to facing his own death. They didn’t need to be fortune-tellers. The signs were clear in the way John tells
the story. So here we have Mary acting as
a harbinger of the imminent death of Jesus but crying out for it to be a
barrier-shattering event like Lazarus’ death, that his death might somehow be
the end of death.
And because we know that in a chapter or two
of this story Jesus will teach his disciples something very important, we can
say here that this gesture by Mary was an extraordinary example of her
modelling the kind of discipleship we are all called to. Mary has done without being told what Jesus
is soon going to do to his friends – wash their feet – drawing them into an
intimate relationship with himself, just as he is in an intimate relationship
with his Father in heaven. And it is in
this relationship that Jesus removes all of our alienation and estrangement from
God.
So this extravagant act of a woman who dared
to go where she was not supposed to go heralds one of the most important things
Jesus wanted to teach his friends in his last few hours with them. In a radical call to servant-hood, Jesus commands
his friends to do to each other what he had just done for the. Jesus in this teaching is turning upside down
all the social conventions of his day.
When the leaders become the least then the Kingdom of God is here. When the poor are the recipients of our extravagance
then the Kingdom of God is here.
Everything is upside down and understanding when
it is that we must go where society says we are not supposed to go is one of
the great challenges of our Lenten journey.
There is no getting away from it – following Jesus is a costly thing. Remember Mary as we move towards Palm Sunday
and into Holy Week. She will be there
with us, reminding us that life can come out of death, and that God is always
ready to do a new thing – even in us.
No comments:
Post a Comment